Introduced in 2010 by Jason Priem and his colleagues, “altmetrics” claims to “expand our view of what impact looks like” by identifying online communities and tracking their online engagement with scholarly content. New sets of metrics, grouped under the umbrella of “altmetrics”, propose new indicators of scholarly impact based on interactions on social media platforms. Citation counts, however, serve as indicators of papers’ impact on other scholars, and are not indicative of their impact on the broader public. Ĭitations have historically served as the dominant measurement for the impact of scholarly publications. In parallel, demands by research funders and administrators for indicators of societal impact have generated wide interest among scholars in evaluating how social media data may be used as a means for measuring scholarly impact beyond the academy. In recent years, social media platforms have significantly increased the online visibility of scholarly products: with more than 4.5 million researchers on ResearchGate and 11 million users on, there is considerable evidence of the increased usage of social media platforms for the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of scholarship. The scholarly communication system has been transformed over the past two decades by the digital age, Web 2.0 applications, and open scholarship initiatives.
We discuss the implications of using metrics derived from these platforms as impact indicators. Zotero users are more likely to use the platform’s search functions and to organize their libraries, while Mendeley users are more likely to take advantage of some of the discovery and networking features-such as browsing papers and groups and connecting with other users. Results show strong differences between platforms: Mendeley users are younger and more gender-balanced Zotero users are more engaged in social media and more likely to come from the social sciences and humanities. The survey examines demographic characteristics, usage of the platforms, as well as attitudes towards key issues in scholarly communication, such as open access, peer review, privacy, and the reward system of science. The present work uses a large-scale survey to study the users of two prominent social reference managers-Mendeley and Zotero. However, little work has been done to understand the data underlying this indicator. Among this ecosystem of heterogeneous indicators, social reference managers have been proposed as indicators of broader use of scholarly work. Remember that you can move your references between programs, so if you don't like one program you can always switch.Altmetric indicators are increasingly present in the research landscape. View our FAQ on which citation managers work best for systematic reviews for more information. Both allow ingestion of large result files from multiple databases and provide deduplication options.
Zotero vs endnote 2018 reddit download#
EndNote will search for available full-text when you are on campus and this is a very quick way to download and organize the full-text of multiple recent references.
Working without internet access: You can use the references stored in EndNote, or Zotero without being connected to the Internet.Cost: There is no cost to start using EndNote Basic, Sciwheel, or Zotero.Basically, think about your needs and decide on your priorities.
0 kommentar(er)
